Keepnet stands out for the breadth of its simulation vectors. Fensivo closes the full cycle on each person's behavior: the leaked credential drives the simulation and the retest validates that the lesson stuck, all included from the first plan.
Keepnet Labs is a global human risk management platform recognized for its breadth: simulations across multiple vectors, automated response to reported emails and leaked credential monitoring available from its 360 tier. Fensivo is a human risk management platform built natively for LATAM that integrates into its core, from the first plan, credential monitoring, simulations driven by those credentials and a retest that validates behavior change. The core difference: Keepnet spreads its breadth across tiers and add-ons; Fensivo brings the complete behavioral cycle included from day one.
| Dimension | FensivoRecommended | Keepnet |
|---|---|---|
| Behavior change validation | Targeted retest that verifies behavior after the training | Algorithmic campaign adjustment by AI; per-person validation not published |
| Targeted retest after the failure | Yes: at three weeks, same category and sophistication with a different template | Not published |
| Dark web credential monitoring | Included in the core, in every plan; feeds simulation selection | Yes, Threat Intelligence module, available from the 360 tier |
| Public price of the equivalent offering | From USD 6.50 per employee per month, full cycle included | 360 tier (the first with credential monitoring): around USD 2.50 per user per month in the 25 to 50 employee band |
| Contract | Annual, 12 months | Annual payment, with an additional discount at 3 years |
| Employee minimum | 25 | The public table starts at 25; below 50, its FAQ asks you to get in touch for custom pricing |
| Spanish | Native LATAM, nearly 200 templates written in Spanish | Site, documentation and support in English; the Spanish variant of its content is not published |
| Regional focus | LATAM, companies of 25 to 500 employees | Global; offices in London and Seattle; data hosted in the EU, United Kingdom, US and United Arab Emirates |
| Implementation | OAuth with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace | SaaS; verified public user reviews point to a learning curve for administrators |
Based on publicly available information for each platform. Keepnet capabilities vary by the plan purchased.
When an employee falls for a Keepnet simulation they get immediate feedback and a training module, and the following campaigns are adjusted algorithmically through its AI features. What Keepnet does not publish is a formal targeted retest mechanism: testing the person who failed again, within a defined window, to verify their behavior changed.
Fensivo puts the retest at the center of the cycle. Three weeks after the microlearning, the person receives a simulation of the same category and sophistication but with a different template, to validate that they learned the lesson and not that they memorized one email. If they fail again, a risk floor kicks in that only lifts after passing several consecutive simulations without falling. Peer-reviewed studies (Ho et al., IEEE S&P 2025; Lain et al., IEEE S&P 2022) show that completing training does not by itself predict a reduction in real failures: what demonstrates change is testing the behavior again.
Keepnet does monitor leaked credentials: its Threat Intelligence module checks whether accounts and passwords from corporate domains appear in known breaches, with continuous monitoring and SIEM integration. According to its public pricing table, that module appears from the 360 tier, the third of its four plans; the Essentials and Plus tiers do not include it.
In Fensivo, credential monitoring is not a module or a tier: it is the core of the platform from day one and in every plan. The 24/7 monitoring of public breach databases and the dark web detects leaked credentials and triggers automatic response by risk bands with remediation deadlines, cutting reaction time from months to hours. And that signal does not stop at an alert: the leaked credential feeds simulation matching, so the simulated attack each person receives reflects the real risk already on them.
Keepnet's site, documentation and support are in English, its published offices are in London and Seattle, and its declared data residency is limited to the European Union, the United Kingdom, the United States and the United Arab Emirates. The Spanish variant of its content is not published. On top of that there is operations: verified public user reviews point to a steep learning curve for administrators.
Fensivo was built natively for LATAM and in Spanish, not translated: nearly 200 Spanish simulation templates within a catalog of about 400, with conversational microlearning in the language people actually work in. Implementation is via OAuth with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, and the platform is designed for companies of 25 to 500 employees that do not have an analyst dedicated to running security tools.
The interface could be more modern in some sections of the platform.
The initial learning curve is steep for whoever administers the tool.
Functionality feels somewhat limited and is not easy to extend to specialized needs.
The analytics dashboard offers little customization.
The licensing model is limited in options.
Recurring drawbacks paraphrased from verified public user reviews. Praise is abundant too; these are the friction patterns that repeat.
In Keepnet, credential monitoring arrives in the 360 tier. In Fensivo it is in the core of every plan and it is not just an alert: the detected credential feeds simulation matching, so the test each person receives reflects their real exposure.
Keepnet does not publish a per-person retest after the failure; its adjustment is algorithmic in the following campaigns. Fensivo tests whoever failed again, three weeks later, with a different template of the same category. That turns training into evidence of behavior change.
Keepnet localizes content into dozens of languages, but its site, documentation and support are in English and verified public user reviews mention a learning curve. Fensivo is native in Spanish for LATAM, deploys via OAuth and is designed for teams of 25 to 500 employees with no full-time security operator.
The approach. Keepnet bets on breadth: many simulation vectors and modules spread across tiers and add-ons. Fensivo bets on the depth of the per-person behavioral cycle: credential monitoring in the core, simulations driven by those credentials and a retest at three weeks that validates behavior change, all included from the first plan.
Yes. Its Threat Intelligence module checks whether credentials from corporate domains appear in known breaches, with continuous monitoring, but it appears from its 360 tier, the third of its four plans. In Fensivo that monitoring is included in every plan from day one and it also drives the selection of the simulations each person receives.
On list price, yes, and the fair comparison is against the equivalent offering. Keepnet's comparable tier is 360, the first that includes credential monitoring: around USD 2.50 per user per month in the 25 to 50 employee band, with annual payment and an additional discount at 3 years. Even that tier does not publish a retest targeted at the employee who failed. Fensivo's price, from USD 6.50 per employee per month on a 12-month contract, includes the full cycle with no tiers or add-ons: credential monitoring in the core that also drives the simulations, microlearning and a retest that validates behavior change. The difference is not paying less, it is paying once for the complete cycle instead of assembling it tier by tier.
Keepnet is a solid option for organizations that need to simulate many different attack vectors across a workforce spread over dozens of languages, and that have a security team with time to run and tune the platform. Its multi-tenant model with white labeling also makes it attractive for MSSPs managing campaigns for multiple clients. If the central requirement is vector breadth and global language coverage with an in-house team to administer it, Keepnet wins that comparison.
Human risk is not managed by stacking modules: it is managed by closing the cycle on each person. See it working with your own team.
Free demo · 30 minutes · No commitment