Profiling risk is not the same as testing it
Kymatio
Kymatio built its differentiation on psychometric profiling: chatbot-guided interviews and decision sessions that, through neuropsychology and AI, classify each employee into insider risk groups. It is a legitimate and distinctive approach, even recognized by Spain's official association of psychologists. But its public documentation does not describe a targeted retest: it does not publish an automatic mechanism that tests again the employee who failed a simulation to verify their behavior changed.
Fensivo
Fensivo does not ask how a person would respond to an attack: it attacks them with a personalized phishing simulation and observes what they do. Whoever falls receives attack-specific microlearning within minutes, and three weeks later faces a simulation of the same category and sophistication but with a different template. That validates that the person learned the lesson, not that they remembered one email. Peer-reviewed studies (Ho et al., IEEE S&P 2025; Lain et al., IEEE S&P 2022) show that completing training does not by itself predict a reduction in real failures: what demonstrates change is testing the behavior again.